Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Virology Journal

Fig. 2

From: Aloe-emodin inhibits African swine fever virus replication by promoting apoptosis via regulating NF-κB signaling pathway

Fig. 2

Antiviral activity of Ae against ASFV (A and C) The ASFV B646L gene copy-number in the ASFV-infected group and Ae-treated ASFV-infected group was detected at different time points by qPCR. The results of three independent experiments (mean ± SD) were represented by one data. (B and D) The ASFV p30 protein expression level in the ASFV-infected group or Ae-treated ASFV-infected group were detected by western blotting. (E) IFA was used to detect the expression level of p30 protein in the control group, the ASFV-infected group and the Ae-treated ASFV-infected group, and the antiviral activity of Ae against ASFV was determined. The results of three independent experiments (mean ± SD) were represented by one data. The graph above is representative of three independent IFA trials with similar results. Significant differences that were compared to the control group were indicated by * (P < 0.05), ** (P < 0.01) and *** (P < 0.001). ASFV, African swine fever virus; qPCR, real-time polymerase chain reaction; IFA, Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay

Back to article page

Virology Journal

ISSN: 1743-422X